Income Capitalization
Uses supported net operating income and an appropriate capitalization rate. Relevance and weight depend on the property's actual income-producing use, leases, expenses, vacancy, market evidence, and valuation date.
This is a general educational guide to NJ assessment and tax mechanics. Monaco CPA does not provide real-estate accounting, property-tax appeal, appraisal, filing, or legal-representation services; use an independent qualified NJ professional.
New Jersey's property tax is an ad valorem tax levied exclusively at the local level. No portion funds state government. The applicable assessment, levy, rate, and property facts determine the calculation.
Three entities determine each property's total tax bill: the municipal government (police, fire, roads, administration), the county government (courts, social services, county roads), and the school district. Each adopts an annual budget, and the combined amount to be raised through property taxes is the tax levy; each component's share varies by jurisdiction and year.
General Tax Rate formula: Total tax levy / total taxable assessed value (the ratable base) = General Tax Rate, expressed per $100 of assessed value. Your tax bill = assessed value x (General Tax Rate / 100).
NJ publishes two rates for each municipality. The General Tax Rate is used to calculate your actual tax bill by multiplying it against your assessed value. The Effective Tax Rate is a statistical comparison rate that adjusts the General Tax Rate to assume 100% valuation across all municipalities, enabling apples-to-apples comparisons. The Effective Tax Rate is NOT used to compute your tax bill. When comparing municipalities, use Effective Tax Rates. When calculating your payment, use the General Tax Rate applied to your assessed value.
The constitutional foundation is Article VIII, Section 1, Paragraph 1 of the NJ Constitution, which requires all real property to be assessed "under general laws and by uniform rules." The implementing legislation is N.J.S.A. 54:4-1 et seq., and the standard is "true value" under N.J.S.A. 54:4-23: what a willing, knowledgeable buyer would pay a willing, knowledgeable seller as of the October 1 pretax year assessment date. NJ applies the same general tax rate to all property classes within a municipality. There is no separate commercial rate. Property is classified under N.J.A.C. 18:12-2.2 into Class 1 (vacant land), Class 2 (residential, 1-4 family), Class 3A/3B (farm), Class 4A (commercial), Class 4B (industrial), and Class 4C (apartments, 5+ units).
NJ has no mandatory fixed reassessment cycle. Some municipalities have gone 20+ years without a revaluation. The Director's Ratio (85% benchmark) and the Coefficient of Deviation (15% benchmark) are the administrative INDICATORS the county board and Division weigh when considering whether to order a revaluation (N.J.A.C. 18:12A-1.14) - crossing a threshold does not itself trigger one, and the actual order, program, and effective year require municipal/county/state confirmation. The Director's Ratio (equalization ratio) represents the average relationship between assessed values and actual sale prices. The NJ Division of Taxation publishes this ratio annually for all 564 municipalities. For appeals, the Common Level Range (Chapter 123, N.J.S.A. 54:3-22) is calculated as plus or minus 15% of the Director's Ratio. If a property's assessment-to-true-value ratio falls outside this corridor, Chapter 123 may affect the statutory computation, subject to the evidence and tribunal decision.
The income-capitalization, sales-comparison, and cost approaches must be evaluated under the actual property and evidence where applicable (Aetna Life Ins. Co. v. City of Newark, 10 N.J. 99 (1952)). No property label assigns a universal weight.
Uses supported net operating income and an appropriate capitalization rate. Relevance and weight depend on the property's actual income-producing use, leases, expenses, vacancy, market evidence, and valuation date.
Analyzes sufficiently comparable arm's-length transactions. Relevance and weight depend on available sales, comparability, adjustments, property rights, market conditions, and valuation date.
Estimates reproduction or replacement cost, depreciation, and land value. Relevance and weight depend on the improvements, age, use, depreciation evidence, land data, and availability of other approaches.
When a business owns its building, the assessment must reflect only the value of the real property, not the going-concern value of the business. Since the 1966 legislation, general business personal property has been exempt from local property tax assessment in NJ; the only business personal property still assessed by local assessors is the machinery and equipment (other than inventory) of local exchange telephone, telegraph and messenger systems companies. Assessors must separate real property value (land, building, and fixtures that are part of the realty) from business/enterprise value (goodwill, trade fixtures, business personal property). For owner-occupied commercial properties, assessors may impute a market rent to determine value via the income approach, even though the owner occupies the space. This means contract rent (what a tenant actually pays) may differ from the economic rent used in the assessment.
Tenant improvements can affect assessed value when they become part of the realty; removable trade fixtures or personal property can receive different treatment. The three-part fixture test applies: annexation (physical attachment), adaptation (suited to the property's use), and intention (permanence). Central HVAC systems, elevators, built-in generators, manufacturing equipment, commercial kitchen equipment, and portable generators are examples whose classification depends on that test and the installation facts, not the equipment label alone. Qualifying improvements completed after October 1 can trigger added assessments under N.J.S.A. 54:4-63.1 et seq., prorated for the remaining tax year.
NJ's municipalities publish locality- and year-specific tax information. Verify the current general rate, assessed value, property class, exemptions, and any project-specific agreement before computing a comparison. Location selection requires complete legal, operational, financing, and tax analysis; this guide does not recommend a site or promise a dollar outcome.
| County | Municipality | Effective Rate | Annual Tax on $1M |
|---|---|---|---|
| Bergen | Teterboro | 0.891% | $8,910 |
| Hudson | Hoboken | 1.070% | $10,700 |
| Morris | Florham Park | 1.270% | $12,700 |
| Middlesex | Cranbury | 1.454% | $14,540 |
| Gloucester | Logan Twp | 1.487% | $14,870 |
| Morris | Hanover Twp | 1.541% | $15,410 |
| Hudson | Secaucus | 1.549% | $15,490 |
| Morris | East Hanover | 1.564% | $15,640 |
| Bergen | East Rutherford | 1.586% | $15,860 |
| Bergen | Carlstadt | 1.681% | $16,810 |
| Mercer | Princeton | 1.814% | $18,140 |
| Somerset | Bridgewater | 1.829% | $18,290 |
| Essex | Newark | 1.845% | $18,450 |
| Hudson | Jersey City | 1.847% | $18,470 |
| Middlesex | Edison | 2.005% | $20,050 |
| Union | Elizabeth | 2.113% | $21,130 |
| Morris | Parsippany | 2.452% | $24,520 |
| Camden | Cherry Hill | 2.598% | $25,980 |
Based on NJ Division of Taxation 2025 General and Effective Tax Rates. Effective tax rates are statistical comparison rates (assuming 100% valuation) used for municipality-to-municipality comparisons. Your actual tax bill is calculated using the General Tax Rate applied to your assessed value. On a $1M equalized-value comparison base, Teterboro (0.891%) versus Cherry Hill (2.598%) produces a $17,070 statistical annual difference under the stated 2025 rates. Effective rates compare municipalities; they do not calculate a specific parcel's tax bill or forecast a future rate or result.
NJ appeal law distinguishes the tax levy from the property assessment and generally places the burden of proof on the taxpayer. Monaco CPA does not evaluate, prepare, file, or represent appeals; confirm current rules with an independent NJ property-tax attorney and appraiser.
NJ courts generally enforce the applicable statutory deadline strictly. Confirm the assessment type, county, municipality, revaluation status, notice, and current statute before filing; added or omitted assessments and certain notice issues can use different rules. Do not assume ordinary mailing delay or hardship extends the deadline.
Appeals are filed on Form A-1 (Petition of Appeal to the County Board of Taxation), with a separate petition required for each parcel. Filing fees range from $5 (assessed value under $150,000) to $150 (assessed value over $1 million). Electronic filing is available through the NJ Appeal Online System. The original petition goes to the County Board, with copies to the municipal tax assessor and municipal clerk. Taxpayers must be current on all taxes through the first quarter to receive a hearing (N.J.S.A. 54:3-27).
The taxpayer must overcome the legal presumption of correctness with sufficient credible evidence of true market value as of October 1 of the pretax year.
Business entities (LLCs, corporations, partnerships, trusts) must be represented by a NJ-admitted attorney at County Board hearings unless the property's prior-year taxes were under $25,000 (Rule 1:21-1(c)). For Tax Court proceedings, businesses other than sole proprietorships must always have attorney representation. Some property-tax attorneys may offer contingent or other fee arrangements. Terms and separate filing or appraisal costs vary; obtain a written quote from an independent provider.
| Factor | County Board | NJ Tax Court |
|---|---|---|
| Standing and initial filing path | Owner standing is typical; tenant standing and any required initial county filing depend on the lease, statute, and procedure | An assessment over $1M can permit direct filing; standing and current procedure still control |
| Filing fee | $5 - $150 | $250 + $50/additional parcel |
| Timeline | Timing depends on the current county-board schedule, filing date, extensions, and procedure | Timing depends on the court's current schedule and the case |
| Process | County-board hearing under the current rules | Court litigation; discovery and expert testimony may apply |
| Review path | A final county-board judgment may be appealed to Tax Court within the applicable 45-day period; service and procedural facts control | Review of a qualifying final Tax Court judgment follows the current Appellate Division rules and deadlines |
No generic reduction or success rate predicts an appeal. Standing, valuation evidence, common-level-range calculations, municipal counterclaims, and tribunal findings determine the result.
Counterclaim risk: A municipality may file a counterclaim seeking an increased assessment when the governing procedures permit. Use an independent qualified NJ property-tax attorney and appraiser to evaluate standing, deadlines, valuation evidence, common-level-range calculations, and counterclaim exposure for the actual parcel before filing.
Under the Freeze Act (N.J.S.A. 54:3-26 for County Board; N.J.S.A. 54:51A-8 for Tax Court), an applicable final judgment may remain binding for the judgment year plus two succeeding years. Statutory change-in-value, revaluation or reassessment, added-assessment, and other exceptions can alter that treatment. The judgment, later property facts, and governing procedure control. Application of the Act is a legal question for an independent NJ property-tax attorney; Monaco CPA does not advise on or file appeals and promises no frozen assessment or other legal result.
This hypothetical holds assumed value and ratio inputs constant to show the arithmetic. It is not an appraisal, legal conclusion, appeal service, or predicted tribunal result.
Illustrative arithmetic: If a tribunal accepted every assumed input and applied the 65% ratio, $600,000 x 65% = $390,000. At the stated 2.0% rate, the annual bill difference would be $2,200. No reduction, Freeze Act treatment, duration, or dollar outcome is promised.
Federal classification determines whether the individual SALT cap applies. The complete return and property-use facts determine the tax result; no fixed outcome is promised.
| Property Type | Where Deducted | SALT Cap? |
|---|---|---|
| Commercial property (owned by business) | Schedule C / Form 1065 / 1120-S / 1120 | Outside individual SALT cap; amount and timing remain fact-specific |
| Rental property (separate LLC) | Schedule E / Form 1065 | Outside individual SALT cap; rental, basis, and passive rules apply |
| Home office (business % of home) | Form 8829 / Schedule C | Qualifying allocated business amount is outside the individual SALT cap; other limits apply |
| Personal residence (non-business) | Schedule A (itemized) | $40,400 SALT cap (MFJ, TY2026) |
| NNN lease (tenant pays as pass-through) | Schedule C / Form 1065 / 1120-S | Outside individual SALT cap if required by the lease and business-related |
OBBBA SALT cap detail: The One Big Beautiful Bill Act (signed July 4, 2025) raised the individual SALT cap to $40,000 for 2025 and $40,400 for 2026. The cap phases down for MAGI above $505,000 for 2026, but never below $10,000 ($5,000 MFS). The OBBBA did not impose a SALT cap on partnerships or S-corporations and did not add an individual-style SALT cap to eligible entity-level deductions. An elective PTE regime still requires its own entity and owner analysis; for example, review the qualifying payment, member credit, QBI, SALT usage, allocation, timing, and compliance costs for NJ BAIT.
A dedicated room is not by itself enough. Under IRS Publication 587, the space must be used exclusively and regularly for the business, and it must also satisfy a qualifying-use route: the principal place of business, a place where the taxpayer meets clients or customers in the normal course of business, or a separate structure not attached to the home. The deduction is then limited by the gross income from the business use, with disallowed amounts carried forward. The figures below assume all of those tests are met and no limit applies; they are an illustration of the arithmetic, not a conclusion that any particular home office qualifies.
Illustrative tax difference: $2,100 x (24% + 6.37%) = approximately $638 under the stated simplified rates and the assumption that the Schedule A amount has no marginal value. Actual federal and NJ treatment requires the complete return; this is not promised savings.
The NJ Business Alternative Income Tax (N.J.S.A. 54A:12-1 et seq.) allows eligible pass-through entities (S-Corps and partnerships) to elect to pay NJ income tax at the entity level. A qualifying payment may receive federal entity-level deduction treatment under the applicable rules, while the owner's credit, QBI, itemization, SALT-cap position, basis, and complete-return effects remain separate.
BAIT concerns state income tax, not property tax directly. Model a valid election and payment together with the owner's allocable credit, entity deduction, QBI, basis, itemization, SALT-cap phase-down, residency, and credit-use facts. No preserved cap amount or net benefit follows from the election label alone.
Fixed-assumption illustration: Assume an eligible pass-through entity makes a valid $25,000 BAIT payment that receives the stated federal entity-level treatment, and the owner has $800,000 MAGI and $15,000 of residential property tax. The individual SALT-cap computation still applies to the owner's itemized taxes and does not turn an otherwise capped property-tax amount into an entity deduction. A complete-return model is required before drawing any benefit. Learn more about NJ BAIT and S-Corp elections.
Some owners use a separate legal entity for real property, but the legal, liability, lender, lease, federal, and NJ tax consequences are fact-specific. This is general education: Monaco CPA does not form entities or provide legal, real-estate accounting, appraisal, or property-tax appeal services. Obtain advice from qualified legal and real-estate professionals before acting.
Legal separation and asset-protection consequences depend on entity formalities, guarantees, insurance, contracts, and state law; an attorney must evaluate them.
Depending on ownership, use, lease terms, and applicable limits, business or rental property taxes and rent may enter different federal computations. The complete facts control.
Qualifying nonresidential real property generally uses 39-year federal straight-line depreciation. A supported cost-segregation analysis may identify components with different recovery periods. The actual asset, use, placed-in-service date, classification, study support, bonus eligibility, and federal/NJ differences control; no deduction amount is promised.
Entity ownership can affect a Section 1031 analysis, but entity continuity, qualified use, identification, timing, and transaction requirements are fact-specific. This guide does not structure or recommend an exchange or provide real-estate closing services.
A valid grouping election can affect passive-activity classification, but eligibility, consistency, disclosure, and the treatment of each loss are fact-specific. This guide does not recommend an election.
For an eligible already-formed operating S-Corp or partnership, the NJ BAIT election and property-tax treatment enter separate computations. Election, payment, entity, owner, QBI, itemization, and complete-return facts control any combined result; no election recommendation or SALT-cap outcome is promised.
Self-rental rule warning: Under Reg. Section 1.469-2(f)(6), when you rent property to a business in which you materially participate, net rental income is recharacterized as nonpassive -- but rental losses remain passive. A grouping election is not universally available or beneficial. Obtain independent legal, real-estate, and tax advice before acting; Monaco CPA does not structure the entities.
Entity-level tax caution: A C-Corporation can create corporate- and shareholder-level tax on some distributions or exits, but the result depends on transaction and shareholder facts. This guide does not select an entity; use qualified legal and tax advisers.
Under the Long Term Tax Exemption Law (N.J.S.A. 40A:20-1 et seq.), developers in designated redevelopment areas make negotiated Payments in Lieu of Taxes instead of conventional property taxes.
For federal tax purposes, PILOT payments may qualify as deductible real property taxes under IRC Section 164 if they satisfy the three-prong test from Rev. Rul. 71-49 (the payment must be (1) ad valorem, (2) imposed on interests in real property, and (3) assessed uniformly against property within the jurisdiction). Each PILOT must be analyzed individually. Under LFN 2025-12, county collection of the 5% share was strengthened with quarterly PILOT reporting beginning November 15, 2025.
A project label, location, or stated development cost does not establish the service-charge base, percentage, allocation, duration, or comparison with conventional property tax. Review the governing statute, project class and phase, ordinance, executed agreement, current assessment, and municipal and county records. Monaco CPA does not negotiate, apply for, or advise whether to pursue a PILOT; obtain independent legal and financial advice before relying on any payment illustration.
Under N.J.S.A. 40A:21-1 et seq., municipalities can grant up to 5-year tax abatements for new construction, improvements, or conversions in areas designated "in need of rehabilitation." This program has different statutory eligibility, filing, duration, ordinance, and project requirements from long-term PILOTs; neither speed nor eligibility follows from project size alone.
Review boundary: Eligibility, covered improvements, application, valuation, timing, approval, and benefit depend on current state law, the municipal ordinance, assessor records, and the actual project. A project label or application alone does not establish an abatement or comparison with a PILOT.
NJ's UEZ program authorizes specified benefits for businesses that meet current zone, certification, activity, application, and compliance requirements. Verify the current municipality designation and program terms before relying on any figure or benefit.
Active UEZ municipalities include Newark, Jersey City, Camden, Elizabeth, Paterson, Trenton, Bayonne, East Orange, New Brunswick, Perth Amboy, Plainfield, Lakewood, and Passaic, among others. UEZs are often sub-areas within a municipality rather than the entire town. Verify boundary eligibility by specific address through DCA. Businesses must apply for certification and recertify periodically. See the NJ Sales Tax Guide for more on UEZ sales tax implications.
Under the Farmland Assessment Act (N.J.S.A. 54:4-23.1 et seq.), land actively devoted to agricultural or horticultural use is assessed based on productivity value rather than market value. The difference from ordinary market-value assessment depends on the parcel, productive use, statutory eligibility, and assessor's determination; no percentage outcome is promised.
Eligibility note: Commercial property owners with excess acreage may qualify when genuine agricultural activity meets the statutory minimums. The assessor determines eligibility and productivity value; Monaco CPA does not apply for, value, or promise a farmland assessment result.
New Jersey has no general tangible personal property tax on ordinary business equipment, though statutory industry exceptions and real-property fixture rules remain. Other states and localities use their own property definitions, exemptions, assessment dates, declarations, and rates, so each location requires a current review.
| State | General comparison point | Key Details |
|---|---|---|
| New Jersey | No general tax on ordinary equipment | Apply statutory-industry exceptions and the annexation, adaptation, and intention test before classifying equipment as a real-property fixture. |
| New York | Review current rule | Review the current state and local classification, fixture, exemption, and assessment rules for the property and location. |
| Pennsylvania | Review current rule | Review the current state and local property class, fixture treatment, exemptions, declarations, and assessment rules. |
| Delaware | Review current rule | Review the current state and local property definitions, exemptions, fixture treatment, and assessment rules. |
| Connecticut | Local regime applies | Confirm the current local declaration date, assessment percentage, mill rate, property class, and any manufacturing or other exemption before computing tax. |
Fixture distinction matters: In New Jersey, annexation, adaptation, and intention determine whether equipment is part of the taxable realty. HVAC, elevators, generators, plumbing, lighting, ceilings, partitions, portable equipment, manufacturing machinery, and trade fixtures must be classified from the actual installation and use facts. Records about attachment, adaptation, removability, and intended permanence support that review but do not guarantee an exemption.
A market-value figure alone does not produce a comparable property-tax bill across jurisdictions because assessment classes, ratios, phase-ins, exemptions, abatements, and nominal rates differ.
Methodology and currency (August 2026): the Philadelphia row uses the official City of Philadelphia rate for 2025-2029, and the NYC row uses the FY2026 Class 4 nominal rate against taxable assessed value with the assumption stated in its note. Earlier versions of this table carried additional out-of-state rows as single-point approximations without a normalized source; those rows were removed in August 2026 rather than published unsourced. Jurisdictions do not all measure the tax base the same way - verify any figure against the assessing jurisdiction before relying on it.
| Location | Annual Tax on $1M | Effective Rate |
|---|---|---|
| NYC (Class 4 commercial) | ~$48,800 | 10.848% of taxable assessed value (~4.88% of market value) |
| NJ commercial property | Property-specific | Current municipal rate and assessment |
| Philadelphia, PA | $13,998 | 1.3998% |
This table is not a location recommendation or a normalized state ranking. Compare the actual property's assessment, classification, current local rate, phase-in, exemptions, abatements, business taxes, and operating facts. For more on capital gains implications of selling commercial property, see the NJ Capital Gains Tax guide.
Corridor names and old municipal-rate snapshots do not establish a current ranking. Verify the actual parcel, current assessment and rate, zoning, incentives, operating needs, and transportation facts before comparing locations.
Verify each municipality's current assessment and rate
Compare the actual parcel, property class, ratable-base context, zoning, and current transportation access.
Verify each municipality's current assessment and rate
Compare the actual parcel, property class, zoning, incentives, operating needs, and current market facts.
Verify each municipality's current assessment and rate
Compare the actual parcel, property class, zoning, transportation needs, and current market facts.
Verify the current assessment and municipal rate
Review the actual parcel, property class, zoning, any revaluation, and current operating needs.
Verify conventional assessment and any project-specific PILOT
A PILOT label does not establish the service charge or a comparison; review the actual agreement and statutory phase.
Verify each municipality's current assessment and rate
Compare the actual parcel, property class, zoning, logistics needs, and current transportation facts.
Ownership and leasing can produce different tax and contract consequences. The governing documents, property use, ownership structure, and current law control each comparison.
| Factor | Own the Building | Lease (NNN) |
|---|---|---|
| Assessment appeal rights | Standing, procedure, and decision authority depend on ownership, the governing statute, and counsel's review | Standing and participation depend on the statute, lease terms, and actual relationship |
| Tax deductibility | Potential property-tax, depreciation, and interest treatment depends on use, liability, basis, capitalization, allocation, and other return limits | Rent and pass-through treatment depends on business use, lease terms, allocation, capitalization, and substantiation |
| SALT cap impact | Qualifying business or income-producing amounts may be reported outside Schedule A; entity ownership alone does not decide treatment | Qualifying business pass-throughs may be reported outside Schedule A; the lease, liability, use, and allocation control |
| Abatement eligibility | An eligible owner or developer may pursue a program under the statute, ordinance, application, and project facts | Any tenant effect depends on the landlord's agreement and the lease terms |
| Tax on sale/exit | Review the current Realty Transfer Fee, graduated fee, property class, consideration, exemptions, ownership, and transaction structure | Lease termination can still involve contractual payments, restoration, assignments, improvements, or other transaction-specific obligations |
Ignoring the Chapter 91 deadline
Failing to respond to a qualifying Chapter 91 income disclosure request within 45 days can bar a conventional valuation appeal and sharply limit relief. Ocean Pines preserves only a narrower reasonableness review of the assessment. The consequences can run with the land, so verify prior-owner compliance during commercial property acquisition due diligence.
Missing the April 1 appeal deadline
NJ courts generally enforce the applicable statutory filing deadline strictly. Determine the correct deadline from the assessment type, county, municipality, revaluation status, notice, and current law; added or omitted assessments and certain notice issues can follow different rules. Seek NJ property-tax counsel promptly rather than relying on an equitable extension.
Deducting business property taxes on Schedule A
Qualifying business-use property taxes generally are reported on the applicable business return (Schedule C, Form 1065, 1120-S, or 1120), not on Schedule A where they're subject to the SALT cap.
Not appealing after a revaluation
A revaluation can change commercial assessments and may affect the filing calendar. Monaco CPA does not evaluate or file appeals; confirm deadlines and valuation issues with an independent NJ property-tax attorney and appraiser.
Holding real estate in a C-Corporation
C-Corporation property can create corporate- and shareholder-level tax in some transactions, but entity choice and exit treatment are fact-specific. Use qualified legal and tax advisers; this guide does not select or form an entity.
Filing without evaluating counterclaim risk
Municipal counterclaims can seek increased assessments. Use an independent NJ property-tax attorney and appraiser to evaluate case-specific exposure; Monaco CPA does not provide that service.
Leasing without negotiating property tax provisions
An NNN tenant's participation in an appeal and exposure to tax pass-throughs depend on the governing law and negotiated lease terms. Review appeal rights, notice, cooperation, allocation, and caps with qualified counsel.
Not checking for PILOT or abatement programs before acquisition
PILOT and Five-Year Abatement terms are project- and municipality-specific. Use independent legal and financial advisers; Monaco CPA does not recommend, negotiate, or apply for them.
Confusing fixtures with personal property
HVAC, elevators, generators, and partitions can be classified as real-property fixtures when the annexation, adaptation, and intention facts support that result. Apply the fixture test rather than classifying them from the item name alone.
More NJ tax guides for business owners from Monaco CPA.
How S-Corp and BAIT tax computations differ; no formation service, election recommendation, or promised outcome.
Read guideSide-by-side comparison of entity types for NJ small businesses in 2026.
Read guideKey differences between NJ and federal tax rules that every NJ business owner should know.
Read guideComplete NJ sales tax guide including UEZ reduced rates and exemptions for businesses.
Read guideEducation about NJ capital-gain rates, category netting, and federal/NJ basis differences.
Read guideGregory Monaco, CPA LLC d/b/a Monaco CPA · Credential status: verify current individual New Jersey CPA license and CPA-firm registration with the NJ State Board
Livingston, NJ 07039 · Written intake: contact form
This page is for informational purposes only and does not constitute tax advice. Monaco CPA does not provide real-estate accounting or commercial property-tax appeal services. Engage an independent attorney, appraiser, and tax professional whose practices cover the work you need. Use of this website does not create a CPA-client relationship. Key NJ Statutes: N.J.S.A. 54:4-1 et seq. (assessment); N.J.S.A. 54:4-23 (true value); N.J.S.A. 54:4-34 (Chapter 91); N.J.S.A. 54:3-21 (appeal rights); N.J.S.A. 54:3-22 (Common Level Range); N.J.S.A. 54:3-26 and 54:51A-8 (Freeze Act); N.J.S.A. 40A:20-1 et seq. (PILOT); N.J.S.A. 40A:21-1 et seq. (Five-Year Abatement); N.J.S.A. 54:4-23.1 et seq. (Farmland Assessment); N.J.S.A. 54A:12-1 et seq. (BAIT). Federal: IRC Section 162, Section 164(b)(6), Section 280A, Section 469. Current as of August 2026.
Tax advice disclaimer: This material is for general educational information only and is not legal, tax, or accounting advice for your specific facts. A CPA-client relationship is formed only through a signed engagement letter.